NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• 2.9x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
• 3.9x better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 2500x more memory clock speed: 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
• 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2577 vs 623
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 212
• 5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9744 vs 1946
• 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.396 vs 6.705
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 373.644 vs 100.391
• 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.54 vs 0.441
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.412 vs 8.146
• 6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.158 vs 20.64
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 vs 977
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1494
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1833
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 vs 977
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1494
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1833
• 17.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3350 vs 192

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 914 MHz
• 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2577 623
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	217 212
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9744 1946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.396 6.705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	373.644 100.391
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.54 0.441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.412 8.146
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	139.158 20.64
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4148 977
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4148 977
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1833
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 192

Compare specifications (specs)