NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M vs NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M and NVIDIA Tesla K80m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
Around 63% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 562 MHz
Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 876 MHz
4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt

Launch date	13 March 2015 vs 17 November 2014
Core clock speed	914 MHz vs 562 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz vs 876 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 300 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m

48.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 44.96 GTexel / s
7.8x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 640
6.1x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,439 gflops
6x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 4 GB
2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1000 or 2500 MHz
Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18174 vs 9729
Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.366 vs 42.396
3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1352.236 vs 373.644
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.572 vs 2.54
Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.764 vs 39.412
Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 198.978 vs 139.158

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 44.96 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 2496 vs 640
Floating-point performance	2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,439 gflops
Maximum memory size	2x 12 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1000 or 2500 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	18174 vs 9729
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	64.366 vs 42.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1352.236 vs 373.644
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.572 vs 2.54
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	75.764 vs 39.412
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	198.978 vs 139.158

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9729

18174

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

42.396

64.366

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

373.644

1352.236

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.54

5.572

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

39.412

75.764

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

139.158

198.978

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	NVIDIA Tesla K80m
PassMark - G3D Mark	2585
PassMark - G2D Mark	217
Geekbench - OpenCL	9729	18174
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	42.396	64.366
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	373.644	1352.236
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.54	5.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	39.412	75.764
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	139.158	198.978
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3350

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler 2.0
Code name	GM107	GK210
Launch date	13 March 2015	17 November 2014
Place in performance rating	884	885
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	876 MHz
Core clock speed	914 MHz	562 MHz
CUDA cores	640
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops	2x 4,373 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	2x 2496
Texture fill rate	44.96 GTexel / s	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	300 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	7,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	1
HDMI
VGA аnalog display support	1
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2x 12 GB
Memory bandwidth	32 or 80 GB / s	2x 240.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 or 2500 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	DDR3 or GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI