NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 97% higher core clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 598 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 33.5 billion / sec
- 3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 336
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 803.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1526 MB
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 76.687 vs 15.053
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 890.785 vs 588.645
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 November 2015 vs 22 March 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1176 MHz vs 598 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s vs 33.5 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 336 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops vs 803.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1526 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 76.687 vs 15.053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 890.785 vs 588.645 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.916 vs 28.659
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.916 vs 28.659 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 76.687 | 15.053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 890.785 | 588.645 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.659 | 35.916 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1737 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6802 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.72 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.899 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2731 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2731 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2062 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GM206 | GF114 |
| Launch date | 26 November 2015 | 22 March 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 961 | 966 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1176 MHz | 598 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | 803.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 336 |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s | 33.5 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 1,950 million |
| CUDA cores | 336 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1526 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.2 GB / s | 72.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6100 + nForce Go 430
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M360
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
AMDRadeon 680M
