NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3366 vs 1596
• Around 93% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10985 vs 5684
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 vs 2536
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 1586
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2418
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 vs 2536
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 1586
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2418

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 245

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3366 1596
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	245 572
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10985 5684
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5264 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5264 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2418

Compare specifications (specs)