NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 954 MHz
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 993 MHz
• Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 122 Watt
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.294 vs 46.273
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.325 vs 777.677
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.794 vs 38.196
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.513 vs 82.511
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 vs 4501
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 vs 4501

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

• 2.7x more texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 47.04 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
• 2x better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 1,505 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3818 vs 3377
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 333 vs 246
• Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 vs 10958
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.914 vs 3.692
• Around 31% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1611 vs 1231

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3377 3818
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	246 333
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10958 15023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.294 46.273
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	795.325 777.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.692 3.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	51.794 38.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	174.513 82.511
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5264 4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5264 4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1231 1611

Compare specifications (specs)