NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 771 MHz
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3374 vs 3191
- 9.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.294 vs 5.972
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.325 vs 355.305
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.692 vs 1.022
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.794 vs 15.706
- 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.513 vs 34.772
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz vs 771 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3374 vs 3191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 vs 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 vs 355.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 vs 1.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 vs 15.706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 vs 34.772 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 98.69 GTexel / s vs 47.04 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
- Around 57% better floating-point performance: 2,369 gflops vs 1,505 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 350 vs 246
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11427 vs 10948
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 vs 5264
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 vs 5264
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 98.69 GTexel / s vs 47.04 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops vs 1,505 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 350 vs 246 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11427 vs 10948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 vs 5264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 vs 5264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3374 | 3191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 246 | 350 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10948 | 11427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 | 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 | 355.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 | 1.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 | 15.706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 | 34.772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 | 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 | 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3362 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1231 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 773 | 775 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $309.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 771 MHz |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,505 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 47.04 GTexel / s | 98.69 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management |