NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M versus NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1096 MHz versus 771 MHz
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3374 versus 3191
- 9.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.294 versus 5.972
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.325 versus 355.305
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.692 versus 1.022
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.794 versus 15.706
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.513 versus 34.772
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 23 July 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz versus 771 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3374 versus 3191 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 versus 5.972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 versus 355.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 versus 1.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 versus 15.706 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 versus 34.772 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 98.69 GTexel / s versus 47.04 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 640
- Environ 57% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,369 gflops versus 1,505 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 44% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3600 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 350 versus 246
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11427 versus 10948
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 versus 5264
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 versus 5264
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 98.69 GTexel / s versus 47.04 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,369 gflops versus 1,505 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 350 versus 246 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11427 versus 10948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 versus 5264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 versus 5264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3374 | 3191 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 246 | 350 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10948 | 11427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 | 5.972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 | 355.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 | 1.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 | 15.706 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 | 34.772 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 | 6747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 | 6747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3362 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1231 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 773 | 775 |
| Genre | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $309.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.80 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,505 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 47.04 GTexel / s | 98.69 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
