NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M und NVIDIA Quadro K5100M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 7 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 42% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1096 MHz vs 771 MHz
- Etwa 33% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3374 vs 3191
- 9.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.294 vs 5.972
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.325 vs 355.305
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.692 vs 1.022
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.794 vs 15.706
- 5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.513 vs 34.772
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 13 March 2015 vs 23 July 2013 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1096 MHz vs 771 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3374 vs 3191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 vs 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 vs 355.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 vs 1.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 vs 15.706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 vs 34.772 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- 2.1x mehr Texturfüllrate: 98.69 GTexel / s vs 47.04 GTexel / s
- 2.4x mehr Leitungssysteme: 1536 vs 640
- Etwa 57% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 2,369 gflops vs 1,505 gflops
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Etwa 44% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 3600 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 350 vs 246
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11427 vs 10948
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 vs 5264
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 vs 5264
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 98.69 GTexel / s vs 47.04 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 1536 vs 640 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,369 gflops vs 1,505 gflops |
Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 3600 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 350 vs 246 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11427 vs 10948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 vs 5264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 vs 5264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3358 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3374 | 3191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 246 | 350 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10948 | 11427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 | 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 | 355.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 | 1.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 | 15.706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 | 34.772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 | 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 | 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3362 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1231 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Maxwell | Kepler |
Codename | GM107 | GK104 |
Startdatum | 13 March 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 773 | 775 |
Typ | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Jetzt kaufen | $309.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 13.80 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1176 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1096 MHz | 771 MHz |
CUDA-Kerne | 640 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,505 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 640 | 1536 |
Texturfüllrate | 47.04 GTexel / s | 98.69 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) Unterstützung | 1 | |
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog Display-Unterstützung | 1 | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Schnittstelle | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | large |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 80 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 2500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Technologien |
||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management |