NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD FirePro D300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M and AMD FirePro D300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 944 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 73.6 GTexel / s vs 68 GTexel / s
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 2,355 gflops vs 2,176 gflops
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.59 vs 51.183

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D300

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
• 2x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20117 vs 14492
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1192.547 vs 720.592
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.209 vs 3.903
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.541 vs 57.947
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 242.179 vs 223.296
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6054 vs 5783
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3397 vs 2566
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6054 vs 5783
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3397 vs 2566

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D300

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14492 20117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.59 51.183
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	720.592 1192.547
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.903 5.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	57.947 78.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	223.296 242.179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5783 6054
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2566 3397
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5783 6054
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2566 3397
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 3351

Compare specifications (specs)