NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M and AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 18% higher core clock speed: 944 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 5.1x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 254 Watt
  • Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3797 vs 2534
  • 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14360 vs 3977
  • 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.903 vs 0.789
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 9 January 2015 vs 19 September 2011
Core clock speed 944 MHz vs 800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 254 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3797 vs 2534
Geekbench - OpenCL 14360 vs 3977
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.903 vs 0.789

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2

  • 3.2x more texture fill rate: 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 73.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 88% higher pipelines: 2x 960 vs 1024
  • Around 30% better floating-point performance: 2x 1,536.0 gflops vs 2,355 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 68% higher memory clock speed: 4200 MHz vs 2500 MHz
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 373 vs 337
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 73.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2x 960 vs 1024
Floating-point performance 2x 1,536.0 gflops vs 2,355 gflops
Maximum memory size 2x 2 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 4200 MHz vs 2500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 373 vs 337

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3797
2534
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
337
373
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
14360
3977
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.903
0.789
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark 3797 2534
PassMark - G2D Mark 337 373
Geekbench - OpenCL 14360 3977
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 67.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 720.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.903 0.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 57.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 223.296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5783
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5783
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1831

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 TeraScale 2
Code name GM204 Barts
Launch date 9 January 2015 19 September 2011
Place in performance rating 721 723
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 950 MHz
Core clock speed 944 MHz 800 MHz
CUDA cores 1024
Floating-point performance 2,355 gflops 2x 1,536.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 1024 2x 960
Texture fill rate 73.6 GTexel / s 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 254 Watt
Transistor count 5,200 million 1,700 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support 1
G-SYNC support
HDMI
VGA аnalog display support 1

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
SLI options 1
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2x 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 80 GB / s 2x 134.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2500 MHz 4200 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI