NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs ATI Mobility Radeon X2500

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M and ATI Mobility Radeon X2500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 2.1x more core clock speed: 944 MHz vs 460 MHz
• 2.1x more boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 460 MHz
• 40x more texture fill rate: 73.6 GTexel / s vs 1.84 GTexel / s
• 85.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 12
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
• 3.1x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 800 MHz
• 46.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3794 vs 82
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 337 vs 235

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X2500

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3794 82
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	337 235

Compare specifications (specs)