NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 68% higher texture fill rate: 73.6 GTexel / s vs 43.9 billion / sec
• 2.1x more pipelines: 1024 vs 480
• Around 68% better floating-point performance: 2,355 gflops vs 1,405.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 219 Watt
• Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1280 MB
• Around 32% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1900 MHz (3800 data rate)
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14345 vs 13266
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.59 vs 36.849
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.947 vs 40.08
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.296 vs 122.953
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5783 vs 4862
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5783 vs 4862

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

• Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 944 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3929 vs 3792
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 vs 335
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 736.185 vs 720.592
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.369 vs 3.903
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3668 vs 2566
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3668 vs 2566

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3792 3929
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	335 471
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14345 13266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.59 36.849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	720.592 736.185
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.903 4.369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	57.947 40.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	223.296 122.953
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5783 4862
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2566 3668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5783 4862
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2566 3668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 3325

Compare specifications (specs)