NVIDIA GeForce 940A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 940A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 944 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 950 MHz
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3615 vs 2566
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3615 vs 2566
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3337
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3337
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 9 January 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 944 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 950 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3615 vs 2566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3615 vs 2566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3337 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 73.6 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 2,355 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 2002 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3794 vs 1107
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 337 vs 214
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 73.6 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 2002 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3794 vs 1107 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 vs 214 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 940A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1107 | 3794 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3615 | 2566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3615 | 2566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3337 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14528 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.59 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 720.592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.903 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.947 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.296 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5783 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5783 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1831 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 940A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 9 January 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 729 | 730 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 944 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2,355 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 73.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 50 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 940A with others
NVIDIAGeForce 940A vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGeForce 940A vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300
NVIDIAGeForce 940A vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 965M
NVIDIAGeForce 940A vs
AMDRadeon R9 M385
NVIDIAGeForce 940A vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100
NVIDIAGeForce 940A vs
AMDRadeon RX 560 XT
