AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M385 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 950 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3002 vs 2566
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3002 vs 2566
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 9 January 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 950 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3002 vs 2566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3002 vs 2566 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 944 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 73.6 GTexel / s vs 56 GTexel / s
- Around 31% better floating-point performance: 2,355 gflops vs 1,792 gflops
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 244
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3797 vs 2061
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 944 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 73.6 GTexel / s vs 56 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops vs 1,792 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 3322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 vs 244 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3797 vs 2061 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M385
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M385 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3002 | 2566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3002 | 2566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 | 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 | 3337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | 336 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2061 | 3797 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14288 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.59 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 720.592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.903 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.947 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.296 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5783 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5783 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1831 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M385 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Strato | GM204 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 9 January 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 729 | 731 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 944 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | 2,355 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s | 73.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 5,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M385 with others
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 965M
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940A
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560 XT
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 710
