AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M385 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 950 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3002 vs 2566
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3002 vs 2566
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 9 January 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3002 vs 2566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3002 vs 2566 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 944 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 73.6 GTexel / s vs 56 GTexel / s
- Around 31% better floating-point performance: 2,355 gflops vs 1,792 gflops
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 335 vs 244
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3792 vs 2061
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 944 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 73.6 GTexel / s vs 56 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops vs 1,792 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 3322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 335 vs 244 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3792 vs 2061 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M385
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M385 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3002 | 2566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3002 | 2566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 | 3337 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | 335 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2061 | 3792 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14345 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.59 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 720.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.903 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.947 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.296 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5783 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5783 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1831 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M385 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Strato | GM204 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 9 January 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 729 | 731 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 950 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 944 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | 2,355 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s | 73.6 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 5,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
TrueAudio | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI |