NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 vs ATI Radeon HD 4810
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 and ATI Radeon HD 4810 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 5.5x more texture fill rate: 109 billion / sec vs 20 GTexel / s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 1664 vs 640
- 4.9x better floating-point performance: 3,920 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 12.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 vs 769
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 425
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 September 2014 vs 28 May 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 109 billion / sec vs 20 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1664 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 vs 769 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 425 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4810
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 148 Watt
- 514.3x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 148 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4810
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | ATI Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 | 769 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 | 425 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 369 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | ATI Radeon HD 4810 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | GM204 | RV770 |
| Launch date | 19 September 2014 | 28 May 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Place in performance rating | 371 | 373 |
| Price now | $407.76 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 625 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1664 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1664 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 109 billion / sec | 20 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 246 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pins | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 3600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
