NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 660 MHz
- 7.9x more texture fill rate: 83.04 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 1280 vs 320
- 6.3x better floating-point performance: 2,657 gflops vs 422.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- 10.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5691 vs 548
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 378 vs 288
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 October 2014 vs 4 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz vs 660 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 83.04 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 2,657 gflops vs 422.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5691 vs 548 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 378 vs 288 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 81 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 81 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5691 | 548 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 378 | 288 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19001 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.101 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.909 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 472 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GM204 | M88 |
Launch date | 7 October 2014 | 4 June 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,560.89 | |
Place in performance rating | 568 | 565 |
Price now | $1,899 | |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.99 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 660 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,657 gflops | 422.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 83.04 GTexel / s | 10.56 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | large |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 120 GB / s | 54.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
PowerPlay 7.0 |