NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M vs AMD FirePro D700

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M and AMD FirePro D700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 850 MHz
• 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 81 Watt vs 274 Watt
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8546 vs 6051
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8546 vs 6051

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D700

• Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel / s vs 83.04 GTexel / s
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
• Around 31% better floating-point performance: 3,482 gflops vs 2,657 gflops
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 5480 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25127 vs 19001
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.325 vs 59.428
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1338.806 vs 1113.788
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.419 vs 4.157
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.354 vs 39.101
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3699
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3699

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D700

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	19001 25127
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	59.428 74.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1113.788 1338.806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.157 6.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.101 91.354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8546 6051
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3699 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3342 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8546 6051
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3699 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3342 3348

Compare specifications (specs)