NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M vs ATI Radeon X700 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M and ATI Radeon X700 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 425 MHz
- 24.4x more texture fill rate: 83.04 GTexel / s vs 3.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 110 nm
- 48x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 128 MB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 860 MHz
- 74.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5691 vs 76
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 378 vs 302
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 October 2014 vs 1 September 2004 |
| Core clock speed | 924 MHz vs 425 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 83.04 GTexel / s vs 3.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 110 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 860 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5691 vs 76 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 378 vs 302 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X700 PRO
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 81 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 81 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X700 PRO
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | ATI Radeon X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5691 | 76 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 378 | 302 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19001 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.101 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.909 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 472 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | ATI Radeon X700 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | R400 |
| Code name | GM204 | RV410 |
| Launch date | 7 October 2014 | 1 September 2004 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,560.89 | $179 |
| Place in performance rating | 568 | 571 |
| Price now | $1,899 | |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.99 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 425 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1280 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,657 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | |
| Texture fill rate | 83.04 GTexel / s | 3.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 120 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0b |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 120 GB / s | 13.76 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 860 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
