NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 290X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 290X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 947 MHz
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 6,060 gflops vs 5,632 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13793 vs 8568
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 853 vs 753
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 vs 117.322
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 vs 11.12
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 vs 628.757
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10471 vs 8729
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10471 vs 8729
- Around 46% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5747 vs 3936
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 June 2015 vs 24 October 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz vs 947 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops vs 5,632 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13793 vs 8568 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 vs 753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 vs 117.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 vs 11.12 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 vs 628.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 vs 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 vs 8729 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5747 vs 3936 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X
- 178.6x more memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43456 vs 42988
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2460.464 vs 1722.98
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.942 vs 37.16
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 vs 3695
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 vs 3695
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43456 vs 42988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2460.464 vs 1722.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.942 vs 37.16 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7055 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7055 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3338 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13793 | 8568 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 | 753 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42988 | 43456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 | 117.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 | 2460.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 | 11.12 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.16 | 120.942 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 | 628.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 | 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 | 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5747 | 3936 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 290X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GM200 | Hawaii |
Launch date | 2 June 2015 | 24 October 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $549 |
Place in performance rating | 295 | 296 |
Price now | $679.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz | 947 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 2816 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops | 5,632 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2816 | 2816 |
Texture fill rate | 176 billion / sec | 176.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,000 million | 6,200 million |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 275 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin + 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.5 GB / s | 320 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |