NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti versus AMD Radeon R9 290X

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 290X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

versus

AMD Radeon R9 290X

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1075 MHz versus 947 MHz
Environ 8% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 6,060 gflops versus 5,632 gflops
Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
Environ 61% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13793 versus 8568
Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 853 versus 753
Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 versus 117.322
Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 versus 11.12
Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 versus 628.757
Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10471 versus 8729
Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10471 versus 8729
Environ 46% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5747 versus 3936

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	2 June 2015 versus 24 October 2013
Vitesse augmenté	1075 MHz versus 947 MHz
Performance á point flottant	6,060 gflops versus 5,632 gflops
Taille de mémore maximale	6 GB versus 4 GB
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	13793 versus 8568
PassMark - G2D Mark	853 versus 753
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	145.843 versus 117.322
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.661 versus 11.12
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	788.464 versus 628.757
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10471 versus 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10471 versus 8729
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5747 versus 3936

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 290X

178.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1250 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 43456 versus 42988
Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2460.464 versus 1722.98
3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.942 versus 37.16
Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 versus 3695
Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 versus 3695

Caractéristiques
Vitesse de mémoire	1250 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
Référence
Geekbench - OpenCL	43456 versus 42988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2460.464 versus 1722.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	120.942 versus 37.16
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	7055 versus 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 versus 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	7055 versus 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 versus 3338

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

13793

8568

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

853

753

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

42988

43456

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

145.843

117.322

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1722.98

2460.464

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11.661

11.12

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

37.16

120.942

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

788.464

628.757

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10471

8729

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

7055

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3338

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10471

8729

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

7055

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3338

3353

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

5747

3936

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	AMD Radeon R9 290X
PassMark - G3D Mark	13793	8568
PassMark - G2D Mark	853	753
Geekbench - OpenCL	42988	43456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	145.843	117.322
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1722.98	2460.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.661	11.12
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	37.16	120.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	788.464	628.757
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10471	8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695	7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3338	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10471	8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695	7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3338	3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5747	3936

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	AMD Radeon R9 290X
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 2.0
Nom de code	GM200	Hawaii
Date de sortie	2 June 2015	24 October 2013
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$649	$549
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	295	296
Prix maintenant	$679.99
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	23.43
Conception		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1075 MHz	947 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1000 MHz
Noyaux CUDA	2816
Performance á point flottant	6,060 gflops	5,632 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2816	2816
Taux de remplissage de la texture	176 billion / sec	176.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt	250 Watt
Compte de transistor	8,000 million	6,200 million
Stream Processors		2560
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI	Internal
Connecteurs d’écran	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Soutien de G-SYNC
HDCP
Résolution VGA maximale	2048x1536
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs
Soutien de DisplayPort
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	PCI Express 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Hauteur	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	10.5" (26.7 cm)	275 mm
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	600 Watt
Options SLI	4x
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	6-pin + 8-pin	1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	6 GB	4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	336.5 GB / s	320 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire	384 Bit	512 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	7.0 GB/s	1250 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)