NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 9.4x more texture fill rate: 176 billion / sec vs 18.7 billion / sec
- 8x more pipelines: 2816 vs 352
- 10.1x better floating-point performance: 6,060 gflops vs 598.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 8.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13793 vs 1617
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 853 vs 458
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 June 2015 vs 25 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 176 billion / sec vs 18.7 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 352 |
Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops vs 598.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13793 vs 1617 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 vs 458 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 171.4x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13793 | 1617 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 853 | 458 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.16 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5747 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GM200 | GF100 |
Launch date | 2 June 2015 | 25 May 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Place in performance rating | 295 | 298 |
Price now | $679.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 850 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2816 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops | 598.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2816 | 352 |
Texture fill rate | 176 billion / sec | 18.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,000 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | 2-way |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin + 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.5 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |