NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce 920M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 954 MHz
• 14.2x more texture fill rate: 176 billion / sec vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• 7.3x more pipelines: 2816 vs 384
• 20.4x better floating-point performance: 6,060 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• 19.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13758 vs 716
• 7.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 852 vs 119
• 11.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42988 vs 3722
• 17.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 vs 8.358
• 10.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1722.98 vs 157.606
• 13.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 vs 0.843
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.16 vs 15.374
• 19.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 vs 40.443
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10471 vs 1598
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 3636
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10471 vs 1598
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 3636
• 4.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1321 vs 326

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

• 7.6x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 257.1x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3338
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3338

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13758 716
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	852 119
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	42988 3722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.843 8.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1722.98 157.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.661 0.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.16 15.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	788.464 40.443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10471 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3695 3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3338 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10471 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3695 3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3338 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1321 326

Compare specifications (specs)