NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce 920M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

versus

NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 954 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 176 billion / sec versus 12.4 GTexel / s
7.3x plus de pipelines: 2816 versus 384
20.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 6,060 gflops versus 297.6 gflops
Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
19.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13758 versus 716
7.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 852 versus 119
11.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 42988 versus 3722
17.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 versus 8.358
10.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1722.98 versus 157.606
13.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 versus 0.843
2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.16 versus 15.374
19.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 versus 40.443
6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10471 versus 1598
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 versus 3636
6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10471 versus 1598
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 versus 3636
4.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1321 versus 326

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	2 June 2015 versus 13 March 2015
Vitesse du noyau	1000 MHz versus 954 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	176 billion / sec versus 12.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2816 versus 384
Performance á point flottant	6,060 gflops versus 297.6 gflops
Taille de mémore maximale	6 GB versus 4 GB
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	13758 versus 716
PassMark - G2D Mark	852 versus 119
Geekbench - OpenCL	42988 versus 3722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	145.843 versus 8.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1722.98 versus 157.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.661 versus 0.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	37.16 versus 15.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	788.464 versus 40.443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10471 versus 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695 versus 3636
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10471 versus 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695 versus 3636
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1321 versus 326

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 920M

7.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 250 Watt
257.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3338
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3338

Caractéristiques
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt versus 250 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire	1800 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 versus 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 versus 3338

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

13758

716

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

852

119

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

42988

3722

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

145.843

8.358

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1722.98

157.606

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11.661

0.843

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

37.16

15.374

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

788.464

40.443

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10471

1598

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3636

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3338

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10471

1598

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3636

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3338

3358

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1321

326

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce 920M
PassMark - G3D Mark	13758	716
PassMark - G2D Mark	852	119
Geekbench - OpenCL	42988	3722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	145.843	8.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1722.98	157.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.661	0.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	37.16	15.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	788.464	40.443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10471	1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695	3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3338	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10471	1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695	3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3338	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1321	326

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce 920M
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler 2.0
Nom de code	GM200	GK208B
Date de sortie	2 June 2015	13 March 2015
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$649
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	310	1297
Prix maintenant	$679.99
Genre	Desktop	Laptop
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	23.43
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1075 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1000 MHz	954 MHz
Noyaux CUDA	2816
Performance á point flottant	6,060 gflops	297.6 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2816	384
Taux de remplissage de la texture	176 billion / sec	12.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt	33 Watt
Compte de transistor	8,000 million	585 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI	Internal
Connecteurs d’écran	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	No outputs
Soutien de G-SYNC
HDCP
Résolution VGA maximale	2048x1536
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	PCI Express 3.0	PCI Express 3.0
Hauteur	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Longeur	10.5" (26.7 cm)
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	600 Watt
Options SLI	4x
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	6-pin + 8-pin
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Mémoire
RAM maximale	6 GB	4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	336.5 GB / s	14.4 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	384 Bit	64 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	7.0 GB/s	1800 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	DDR3
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Optimus
Verde Drivers