NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK versus AMD Radeon R9 270X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and AMD Radeon R9 270X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 213 billion / sec versus 84 GTexel / s
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 2880 versus 1280
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,645 gflops versus 2,688 gflops
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8972 versus 4870
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.677 versus 63.87
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.988 versus 6.354
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8721 versus 8068
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8721 versus 8068
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3095 versus 1772
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 8 October 2013 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 213 billion / sec versus 84 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 versus 1280 |
Performance á point flottant | 5,645 gflops versus 2,688 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8972 versus 4870 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 versus 63.87 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 versus 6.354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 versus 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 versus 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3095 versus 1772 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 270X
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 39% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 613 versus 592
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1314.72 versus 1293.474
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.21 versus 22.384
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 315.412 versus 290.861
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 versus 3679
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 versus 3679
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 613 versus 592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.72 versus 1293.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 versus 22.384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.412 versus 290.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 versus 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 versus 3679 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8972 | 4870 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 | 613 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27012 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 | 63.87 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1293.474 | 1314.72 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 | 6.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.384 | 85.21 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 290.861 | 315.412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 | 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 | 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3095 | 1772 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | AMD Radeon R9 270X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GK110B | Curacao |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 8 October 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | $199 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 452 | 453 |
Prix maintenant | $999.99 | $399 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.82 | 16.05 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 889 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 2880 | |
Performance á point flottant | 5,645 gflops | 2,688 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 1280 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 213 billion / sec | 84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,080 million | 2,800 million |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 2 x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 336 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |