NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 889 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 44.4x more texture fill rate: 213 billion / sec vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 36x more pipelines: 2880 vs 80
- 58.8x better floating-point performance: 5,645 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- 180x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9178 vs 51
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 482
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 1 January 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 889 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 213 billion / sec vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2880 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops vs 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9178 vs 51 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 vs 482 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
- 7.8x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 171.4x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
GPU 2: ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9178 | 51 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 | 482 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27076 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1293.474 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.384 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 290.861 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3095 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK110B | RV620 |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 1 January 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 432 | 344 |
| Price now | $999.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.82 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 889 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2880 | |
| Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops | 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 2880 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 213 billion / sec | 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 32 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,080 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x VHDCI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 170 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 336 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
