NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 889 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 44.4x more texture fill rate: 213 billion / sec vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 36x more pipelines: 2880 vs 80
- 58.8x better floating-point performance: 5,645 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- 177.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9050 vs 51
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 482
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 1 January 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 889 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 213 billion / sec vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2880 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops vs 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9050 vs 51 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 vs 482 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
- 7.8x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 171.4x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
GPU 2: ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9050 | 51 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 | 482 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25674 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1293.474 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.384 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 290.861 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3095 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK110B | RV620 |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 1 January 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 440 | 322 |
| Price now | $999.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.82 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 889 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2880 | |
| Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops | 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 2880 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 213 billion / sec | 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 32 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,080 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x VHDCI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 170 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 336 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 560
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 440
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
AMDRadeon R9 270X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
AMDFirePro W7100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
AMDRadeon E6465
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
