NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN and NVIDIA Quadro 5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
2.1x more core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 405 MHz
11.6x more texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 16.2 GTexel / s
8.4x more pipelines: 2688 vs 320
9.1x better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 518.4 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
3.4x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1792 MB
4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8192 vs 2060
Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 648 vs 426
Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24400 vs 23008

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	19 February 2013 vs 27 July 2010
Core clock speed	837 MHz vs 405 MHz
Texture fill rate	187.5 billion / sec vs 16.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2688 vs 320
Floating-point performance	4,709 gflops vs 518.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 1792 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	8192 vs 2060
PassMark - G2D Mark	648 vs 426
Geekbench - OpenCL	24400 vs 23008

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
400x more memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5249 vs 3715
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7205 vs 3356
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5249 vs 3715
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7205 vs 3356

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed	2400 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	5249 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	7205 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	5249 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	7205 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

8192

2060

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

648

426

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

24400

23008

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

5249

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

7205

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

5249

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

7205

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN	NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	8192	2060
PassMark - G2D Mark	648	426
Geekbench - OpenCL	24400	23008
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	62.027
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1218.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	36.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	215.546
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	5249
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	7205
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	5249
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	7205
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2901

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN	NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	GK110	GF100
Launch date	19 February 2013	27 July 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$999
Place in performance rating	423	424
Price now	$2,054.59
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100)	5.09
Technical info
Boost clock speed	876 MHz
Core clock speed	837 MHz	405 MHz
CUDA cores	2688
Floating-point performance	4,709 gflops	518.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	2688	320
Texture fill rate	187.5 billion / sec	16.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	7,080 million	3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...	No outputs
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	10.5" (26.7 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	1792 MB
Memory bandwidth	288.4 GB / s	76.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	384-bit GDDR5	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6.0 GB/s	2400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
ECC (Error Correcting Code)