NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 24
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1417 vs 1042
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2197 vs 1397
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2197 vs 1397
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 878
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 878
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2227
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2227
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 1 September 2017 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 256 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1417 vs 1042 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 2227 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 993 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 189
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 vs 4256
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 vs 189 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 vs 4256 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1417 | 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 | 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4256 | 4592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 2227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | GM108 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 1 September 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 891 | 1380 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
Quick Sync |