NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3331
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3331
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 17 May 2017 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3331 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 965 MHz
- Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 993 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2454 vs 1429
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 443 vs 188
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9807 vs 4265
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 vs 2197
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 vs 2197
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 3502
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 3502
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 965 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2454 vs 1429 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 443 vs 188 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9807 vs 4265 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 vs 2197 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 vs 2197 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 3502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 3502 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1429 | 2454 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 | 443 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4265 | 9807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 | 3629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 | 3629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3331 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1086 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
Code name | GM108 | N17P-G1 |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 17 May 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 916 | 860 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 63.91 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 1670 MHz |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 30 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12_1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |