NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.251 vs 24.676
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3336
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1122 MHz
• Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1242 MHz
• 2.6x more texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 29.81 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5918 vs 1814
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 vs 195
• 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 6461
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 31.613
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 406.203
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 2.034
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 107.608
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 2796
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 2796
• 3.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 vs 632

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1814 5918
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	195 323
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6461 20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.613 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	406.203 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.034 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.251 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	107.608 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2796 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2796 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	632 2340

Compare specifications (specs)