NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 9.4x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 19.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 20
- 22.5x better floating-point performance: 1,127 gflops vs 50 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2259 vs 630
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9584 vs 3210
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 8.844
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 495.238 vs 171.17
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.365 vs 1.115
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 10.385
- 11.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 12.361
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 988
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1702
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2808
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 988
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1702
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2808
- 5.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 999 vs 194
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 May 2017 vs 3 June 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 20 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops vs 50 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2259 vs 630 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9584 vs 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 vs 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 vs 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 vs 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 vs 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 vs 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 vs 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 vs 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 vs 194 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 213
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 vs 213 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2259 | 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9584 | 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 7.5 |
| Code name | GP108 | Haswell GT2 |
| Launch date | 17 May 2017 | 3 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 875 | 1359 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 50 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 20 |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
