NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
- Around 50% better floating-point performance: 1,127 gflops vs 752.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1802 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2259 vs 793
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 213 vs 149
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9584 vs 3866
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 9.392
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 495.238 vs 157.479
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.365 vs 0.864
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 16.101
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 44.77
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 1589
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3235
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3339
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 1589
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3235
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3339
- 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 999 vs 345
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 May 2017 vs 1 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops vs 752.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1802 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2259 vs 793 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 vs 149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9584 vs 3866 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 vs 9.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 vs 157.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 vs 0.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 vs 16.101 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 vs 44.77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 vs 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 vs 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3339 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 vs 345 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2259 | 793 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | 149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9584 | 3866 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | 9.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | 157.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | 0.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | 16.101 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | 44.77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3339 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 | 345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP108 | GK107 |
Launch date | 17 May 2017 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 875 | 1301 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1802 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |