NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 17x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 37.505
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 84.186
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 May 2017 vs 25 June 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 vs 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 vs 84.186 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 937 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 46.98 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 1152 vs 384
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,378 gflops vs 1,127 gflops
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4803 vs 2259
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 213
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14261 vs 9584
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.402 vs 495.238
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.09 vs 2.365
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.457 vs 38.965
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 vs 4330
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 vs 4330
- Around 66% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 vs 999
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 937 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 46.98 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops vs 1,127 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 vs 2259 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 213 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 vs 9584 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 vs 495.238 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 vs 2.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 vs 38.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 vs 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 vs 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 vs 999 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2259 | 4803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | 532 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9584 | 14261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 | 1659 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | GP108 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 17 May 2017 | 25 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 875 | 576 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Price now | $249.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 2,378 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1152 |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | 94.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1152 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
