NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 18% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 797 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 915 MHz
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 22.828
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 495.238 vs 210.585
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 28.662
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3684
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3684

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 23% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 1,127 gflops
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3072 vs 2259
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 226 vs 213
• Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10427 vs 9584
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.427 vs 2.365
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.83 vs 145.794
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 vs 4330
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 vs 4330
• Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1151 vs 999

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2259 3072
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	213 226
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9584 10427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.905 22.828
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	495.238 210.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.365 3.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.965 28.662
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.794 162.83
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 4938
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 4938
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	999 1151

Compare specifications (specs)