NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 924 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 8.1x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 81 Watt
• 2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 81.909
• 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 999 vs 472

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

• Around 77% higher texture fill rate: 83.04 GTexel / s vs 46.98 GTexel / s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 2,657 gflops vs 1,127 gflops
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5691 vs 2259
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 378 vs 213
• Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19001 vs 9584
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 59.428 vs 45.905
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1113.788 vs 495.238
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.157 vs 2.365
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8546 vs 4330
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8546 vs 4330

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2259 5691
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	213 378
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9584 19001
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.905 59.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	495.238 1113.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.365 4.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.965 39.101
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.794 81.909
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 8546
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 8546
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3342
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	999 472

Compare specifications (specs)