NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 3.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 112
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 10.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1839 vs 464
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 63
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 2845
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3304
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 2845
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3304
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 21 July 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1519 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 112 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1839 vs 464 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 vs 63 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1839 | 464 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 63 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6691 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 2845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3304 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
| Code name | GP108 | G92 |
| Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 21 July 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1005 | 1069 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
| Price now | $103.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.86 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1519 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 112 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 112 | |
| Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX230 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 Ti 4600
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 4200 Go
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5900 Ultra
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
ATIFirePro V7800
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M445DX
