NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and NVIDIA Tesla K20c videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 706 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 22.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 16% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5200 MHz
Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 12 November 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1519 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5200 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20c
- 6.5x more pipelines: 2496 vs 384
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15597 vs 6512
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.423 vs 21.591
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1427.15 vs 445.82
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.128 vs 1.736
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.383 vs 32.43
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 179.044 vs 102.234
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2496 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15597 vs 6512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.423 vs 21.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1427.15 vs 445.82 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.128 vs 1.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.383 vs 32.43 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.044 vs 102.234 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA Tesla K20c |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1834 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6512 | 15597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 | 39.423 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 | 1427.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 | 4.128 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 | 64.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 | 179.044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA Tesla K20c | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP108 | GK110 |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 12 November 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1013 | 1016 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,199 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1519 MHz | 706 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2496 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 7,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 146.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 208.0 GB / s |