NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and AMD Radeon 535 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 34% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2413 vs 1077
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 193
- Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9230 vs 6124
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 2343
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2405
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 2343
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2405
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2413 vs 1077 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 vs 193 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9230 vs 6124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 vs 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 vs 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2413 | 1077 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 193 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9230 | 6124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GP108B | Topaz |
| Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 902 | 986 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 834 M |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 24 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX250 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150M + nForce 630M
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 11
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
NVIDIAT400
