NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and AMD Radeon 535 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 34% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 vs 1062
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 240 vs 189
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9329 vs 6091
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 2343
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2405
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 2343
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2405
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 vs 1062 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 vs 189 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9329 vs 6091 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 vs 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 vs 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 | 1062 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 189 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9329 | 6091 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GP108B | Topaz |
| Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 861 | 982 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 834 M |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 24 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX250 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
ATIRadeon X1600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M380
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
AMDRadeon 540
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
