NVIDIA GeForce MX250 versus AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and AMD Radeon 535 Mobile pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 28% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 937 MHz versus 730 MHz
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1038 MHz versus 1024 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 34% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 4500 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2413 versus 1077
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 versus 193
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9230 versus 6124
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 versus 2343
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 2405
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 versus 2343
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 2405
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 versus 18 April 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz versus 730 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz versus 1024 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 4500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2413 versus 1077 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 versus 193 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9230 versus 6124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 versus 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 versus 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3346 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2413 | 1077 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 193 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9230 | 6124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | GP108B | Topaz |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 902 | 986 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | Radeon 500 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 834 M |
| Unités de Compute | 6 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 784.1 gflops | |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 384 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.60 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 24 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 48 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce MX250 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150M + nForce 630M
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 11
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
NVIDIAT400
