NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 3.1x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
• Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 vs 1358
• Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9329 vs 6620
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 36.485
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 vs 246.614
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.64 vs 1.888
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.7 vs 21.014
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.816 vs 42.981
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 2306
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1514
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3333
• Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 2306
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1514
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3333
• Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 888 vs 720

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 240

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 1358
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	240 338
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9329 6620
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.992 36.485
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	535.24 246.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.64 1.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.7 21.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	141.816 42.981
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 2306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 2306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	888 720

Compare specifications (specs)