NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 3.1x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 vs 1042
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9329 vs 4592
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 27.062
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 vs 273.504
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.64 vs 1.777
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.7 vs 19.939
• 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.816 vs 31.881
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2227
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2227
• 14.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 888 vs 62

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1038 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 1042
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	240 241
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9329 4592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.992 27.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	535.24 273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.64 1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.7 19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	141.816 31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 2227
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	888 62

Compare specifications (specs)