NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 902 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1782 MHz
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 vs 1170
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9329 vs 3771
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 11.448
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 vs 206.777
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.64 vs 0.792
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.7 vs 14.637
• 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.816 vs 20.86
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 2134
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2375
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3328
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 2134
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2375
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3328

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 295 vs 240
• Around 76% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1565 vs 888

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 1170
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	240 295
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9329 3771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.992 11.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	535.24 206.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.64 0.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.7 14.637
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	141.816 20.86
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 2134
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 2375
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 2134
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 2375
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3328
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	888 1565

Compare specifications (specs)