NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 928 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 11x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 110 Watt
• 1201.6x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9329 vs 7900
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 23.168
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.64 vs 2.141
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.7 vs 28.29
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.816 vs 47.404
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 3948
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3335
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 3948
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3335
• Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 888 vs 881

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 vs 2392
• Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 240
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 vs 535.24

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 2527
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	240 416
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9329 7900
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.992 23.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	535.24 592.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.64 2.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.7 28.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	141.816 47.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	888 881

Compare specifications (specs)