NVIDIA GeForce MX250 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 937 MHz versus 928 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 11x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 110 Watt
- 1201.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9329 versus 7900
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 versus 23.168
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.64 versus 2.141
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.7 versus 28.29
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.816 versus 47.404
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 versus 3948
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3335
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 versus 3948
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3335
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 888 versus 881
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 versus 9 October 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz versus 928 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 110 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9329 versus 7900 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 versus 23.168 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 versus 2.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 versus 28.29 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 versus 47.404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 versus 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 versus 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 versus 881 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 versus 2392
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 versus 240
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 versus 535.24
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 versus 2392 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 versus 240 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 versus 535.24 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 | 2527 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 416 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9329 | 7900 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | 23.168 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | 592.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | 2.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | 28.29 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | 47.404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 | 881 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP108B | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 | 9 October 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 861 | 846 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $169.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz | 928 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,425 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce MX250 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
ATIRadeon X1600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M380
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
AMDRadeon 540
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
