NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• 16x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 160 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

• Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 937 MHz
• Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• 5x more pipelines: 1920 vs 384
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 vs 2392
• 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 vs 240
• 7.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 vs 9329
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 vs 46.992
• 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 vs 535.24
• 8.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 vs 2.64
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 vs 44.7
• 8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 vs 141.816
• 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 4027
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3710
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3357
• 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 4027
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3710
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3357
• Around 40% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1242 vs 888

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 14119
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	240 746
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9329 71402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.992 217.04
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	535.24 3119.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.64 21.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.7 133.975
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	141.816 1141.283
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 7442
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 6714
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 7442
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 6714
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	888 1242

Compare specifications (specs)