NVIDIA GeForce MX250 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- 16x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 160 Watt
Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 versus 7 January 2019 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Environ 46% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1365 MHz versus 937 MHz
- Environ 62% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1680 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- 5x plus de pipelines: 1920 versus 384
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- 5.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 versus 2392
- 3.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 versus 240
- 7.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 versus 9329
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 versus 46.992
- 5.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 versus 535.24
- 8.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 versus 2.64
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 versus 44.7
- 8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 versus 141.816
- 5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 4027
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3710
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3357
- 5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 4027
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3710
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3357
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1242 versus 888
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz versus 937 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
Pipelines | 1920 versus 384 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 versus 2392 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 versus 240 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 versus 9329 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 versus 46.992 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 versus 535.24 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 versus 2.64 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 versus 44.7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 versus 141.816 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 4027 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 4027 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 versus 888 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 | 14119 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 746 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9329 | 71402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | 133.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 | 1242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
Nom de code | GP108B | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 | 7 January 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 861 | 161 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1920 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 229 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
RAM maximale | 6 GB |