NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1594 MHz vs 1019 MHz
- 163.5x more texture fill rate: 38.26 GTexel/s vs 234 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 30x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1673
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1673
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2784 vs 1849
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2784 vs 1849
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 3 May 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz vs 1019 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s vs 234 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 1673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 1673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 vs 1849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 vs 1849 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- 8x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 384
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 vs 2 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16270 vs 10876
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 230
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5590 vs 2453
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6875 vs 3808
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6875 vs 3808
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 384 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16270 vs 10876 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 230 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5590 vs 2453 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6875 vs 3808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6875 vs 3808 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10876 | 16270 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | 465 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2453 | 5590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 1673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 1673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 | 1849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 | 1849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 | 6875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 | 6875 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.114 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.656 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.836 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.861 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | GP108 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 3 May 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 765 | 737 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $999 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.01 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz | 1019 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,224 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2x 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 25.50 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s | 234 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1800 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,130 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 11.0" (27.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | Quad | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 384 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX330 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIRadeon X600 SE
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
