NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1594 MHz vs 1085 MHz
1102x more texture fill rate: 38.26 GTexel/s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
5.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 55 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
300.4x more memory clock speed: 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) vs 5.0 GB/s
Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10706 vs 9306

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 Feb 2020 vs 18 February 2014
Core clock speed	1531 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Boost clock speed	1594 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Texture fill rate	38.26 GTexel/s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt vs 55 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) vs 5.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	10706 vs 9306
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 3346

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 vs 228
Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3337 vs 2405
Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 2784
Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 2784
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 vs 3808
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 vs 3808

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	512 vs 384
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	515 vs 228
PassMark - G3D Mark	3337 vs 2405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3704 vs 2784
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3704 vs 2784
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4498 vs 3808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4498 vs 3808

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10706

9306

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

228

515

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2405

3337

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3346

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3346

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2784

3704

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2784

3704

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3808

4498

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3808

4498

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX330	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Geekbench - OpenCL	10706	9306
PassMark - G2D Mark	228	515
PassMark - G3D Mark	2405	3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2784	3704
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2784	3704
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3808	4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3808	4498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		34.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		639.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.341
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		69.814
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1050

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX330	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Code name	GP108	GM107
Launch date	10 Feb 2020	18 February 2014
Place in performance rating	757	724
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$119
Price now		$150.99
Value for money (0-100)		27.54
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1594 MHz	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	1531 MHz	1020 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	38.26 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	19.13 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1,224 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	512
Pixel fill rate	25.50 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	38.26 GTexel/s	34.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	1800 million	1,870 million
CUDA cores		512
Floating-point performance		1,111 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature		95 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	IGP
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		5.7" (14.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	48.06 GB/s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)	5.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA