NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs ATI FireMV 2200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and ATI FireMV 2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 4.2x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 324 MHz
- 36250x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 1.296 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 110 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 392 MHz
- 78x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2809 vs 36
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 1 January 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 324 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 1.296 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 392 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2809 vs 36 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireMV 2200
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 259 vs 236
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 259 vs 236 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: ATI FireMV 2200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | ATI FireMV 2200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2809 | 36 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 | 259 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13522 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | ATI FireMV 2200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Rage 9 |
Code name | GP107 | RV370 |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 1 January 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 668 | 666 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 324 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 1.296 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 3300 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 170 mm | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 3.136 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 392 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.0 |