NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce MX350

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
1302.1x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 36.08 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 45 Watt
Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2807 vs 2521
Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 235 vs 225
Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13562 vs 9809
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4655 vs 3817
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3685
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4655 vs 3817
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3685
Around 27% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1247 vs 979

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 Feb 2020 vs 12 March 2014
Texture fill rate	46.98 GTexel/s vs 36.08 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2807 vs 2521
PassMark - G2D Mark	235 vs 225
Geekbench - OpenCL	13562 vs 9809
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4655 vs 3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4655 vs 3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1247 vs 979

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2807

2521

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

235

225

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

13562

9809

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4655

3817

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4655

3817

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3353

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1247

979

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2807	2521
PassMark - G2D Mark	235	225
Geekbench - OpenCL	13562	9809
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4655	3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4655	3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1247	979
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		37.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		388.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		38.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		151.016

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Code name	GP107	GM107
Launch date	10 Feb 2020	12 March 2014
Place in performance rating	654	896
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1468 MHz
Core clock speed	1354 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	58.72 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	29.36 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1.879 TFLOPS
Pipelines	640	640
Pixel fill rate	23.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	46.98 GTexel/s	36.08 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	20 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	3300 million	1,870 million
CUDA cores		640
Floating-point performance		1,155 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	56.06 GB/s	80.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Standard memory configuration		DDR3 or GDDR5
API support
DirectX		12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL		1.1
OpenGL		4.5
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA