NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- 431x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.4x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 148 Watt
- 250.3x more memory clock speed: 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
- 3.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1247 vs 369
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 19 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 148 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 vs 369 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- 2.6x more pipelines: 1664 vs 640
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 vs 2807
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 235
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28498 vs 13562
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 4655
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 4655
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1664 vs 640 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 vs 2807 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 235 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 vs 13562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 vs 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 vs 4655 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 | 9640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 | 766 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13562 | 28498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 | 369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 19 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 654 | 371 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Price now | $407.76 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1664 |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 109 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 148 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3300 million | 5,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 1664 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pins |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||


