NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1050 MHz
  • Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1178 MHz
  • 431x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 7.4x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 148 Watt
  • 250.3x more memory clock speed: 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
  • 3.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1247 vs 369
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 vs 19 September 2014
Core clock speed 1354 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Boost clock speed 1468 MHz vs 1178 MHz
Texture fill rate 46.98 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt vs 148 Watt
Memory clock speed 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1247 vs 369

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

  • 2.6x more pipelines: 1664 vs 640
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 vs 2807
  • 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 235
  • 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28498 vs 13562
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 4655
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 4655
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1664 vs 640
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 9640 vs 2807
PassMark - G2D Mark 766 vs 235
Geekbench - OpenCL 28498 vs 13562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11499 vs 4655
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11499 vs 4655

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2807
9640
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
235
766
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
13562
28498
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4655
11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4655
11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
1247
369
Name NVIDIA GeForce MX350 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
PassMark - G3D Mark 2807 9640
PassMark - G2D Mark 235 766
Geekbench - OpenCL 13562 28498
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4655 11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4655 11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1247 369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1225.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.737
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 490.688

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Maxwell 2.0
Code name GP107 GM204
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 19 September 2014
Place in performance rating 654 371
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $329
Price now $407.76
Value for money (0-100) 28.59

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1468 MHz 1178 MHz
Core clock speed 1354 MHz 1050 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1.879 TFLOPS
Pipelines 640 1664
Pixel fill rate 23.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 46.98 GTexel/s 109 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt 148 Watt
Transistor count 3300 million 5,200 million
CUDA cores 1664
Floating-point performance 3,920 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 98 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 6-pins
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 500 Watt
SLI options 4x

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 56.06 GB/s 224 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.4

Technologies

3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround